Media Coverage



Globe and Mail

Globe_Gray.png

National Post


national_post.png

Toronto Star


toronto_star_1.png

toronto_star_2.png


Town Crier


town_crier_1.png

town_crier_2.png

Green Living


green_living_cover.png

green_living_mag1.png



City TV Coverage


city_tv_1.5.jpeg
city_tv_2.jpeg

city_tv_3.jpeg

Toronto Star Coverage


Winnipeg Free Press Coverage


Breaking News
Control of plastic bags back on councillors' plate
By: Joe Paraskevas
Updated: November 13, 2008 at 07:18 AM CST
The days could be numbered for plastic bags, the scourge of city back lanes and tall tree branches.
City councillors yesterday ordered Winnipeg's senior bureaucrat to look into ways of limiting the number of plastic garbage and grocery bags after the issue had a surprising reversal of fortune in city hall debate.
Only a week after another committee set aside the question of how to limit the numbers of plastic bags, which are seen by many as an environmental abomination, executive policy committee, made up of the most powerful civic politicians, voted 7-0 to send the matter to the office of Chief Administrative Officer Glen Laubenstein.
"Not just (public) education," said Transcona Coun. Russ Wyatt, when asked what to expect from Laubenstein.
"Serious methods on the ways and means of how to reduce the use of plastic bags."
Laubenstein said councillors could expect a report on plastic bags within three months.
It was Wyatt who tabled the motion to have Laubenstein come up with a strategy to limit plastic-bag use after Wyatt lobbied last week before the city's public works committee for a 10-cent levy on each plastic bag used in a commercial transaction.
He said the city could now look at plastic-bag fees, mandating biodegradable plastic bags, combining both measures or coming up with other alternatives.
Calls on governments to cut back on plastic bags are widespread.
In Toronto Wednesday, a Grade 6 class was expected to lobby that city's government to ban them.
Anti-plastic bag measures have even been proposed at Winnipeg city hall before.
The bags are emblematic of today's culture, used for the simplest consumer purchases. But they are also left to litter the urban landscape, blow through landfills and pollute lakes, oceans and waterways.
Reports say only about one per cent of plastic bags are currently recycled.
The bags take centuries to break down in landfills, reports add, and before they do they often simply become litter.
Before Wyatt's motion, Don Woodstock, an off-duty Winnipeg transit driver, appeared before EPC with about half a dozen light green, biodegradable plastic bags that he urged the city to use instead of regular garbage bags that line most wastebaskets -- and even recycling containers -- at city hall.
"This doesn't do us any good," Woodstock said, picking up a regular garbage bag. "This does," he added, showing councillors a biodegradable bag.
In 2007, the city itself used 4,310 garbage bags, according to a spokesman.
Woodstock admitted biodegradable bags were about four times more expensive than regular plastic bags, which could cost about 20 cents each, when bought in bulk.
He said companies that use the bags should bear the cost of the environmental damage the bags do.
"They need to start paying their way," Woodstock said.
Mayor Sam Katz thanked Woodstock for his "passion" as well as his presentation and St. Norbert Coun. Justin Swandel took one of the biodegradable bags Woodstock had strewn across the boardroom table
joe.paraskevas@freepress.mb.ca


Globe and Mail


A BITTER DISPUTE IS BREWING
Toronto's tempest in a Tim's cup
Recycling targets seem based on the belief that the more we recycle, the faster we will go to Heaven

MARGARET WENTE

�60�November 15, 2008
Poor old Toronto is in the dumps. Poverty is growing and the economy is tanking. House prices have taken a mighty dive. But never fear! City Hall never sleeps. Ever vigilant on the citizens' behalf, Toronto city councillors have taken on the biggest menace of them all. I refer, of course, to plastic coffee cup lids.
"The status quo is going to change, and it can't change soon enough for me," roared waste czar Glenn De Baeremaeker.

We Torontonians are crazy about our takeout coffee. And where does most of our takeout coffee come from? Tim Hortons! Tim's cups are made of virtuous recyclable paper. But the lids are made of evil plastic, which means they might as well be WMDs. The lids make the cups impossible to recycle unless you can persuade people to separate the cups and lids when they throw them out. There is an expensive recycling machine that will separate them, but the city says it can't afford one. So now the city wants people to use their own mugs for takeout coffee. It wants Tim's to give them 20 cents off when they do. Right now Tim's only gives them 10 cents off.

The tempest in a Tim's cup has brewed up bitter arguments between righteous city councillors and the restaurant industry. And there's more to come. The city is soon to vote on a measure that will require stores to start giving 10 cents off to anyone who brings her own shopping bag instead of using a plastic one.

Virtuous Toronto has perhaps the most aggressive recycling target of any city in the world. This target - 70 per cent - is not based on economics, or feasibility, or anything that resembles common sense, but on the simple belief that the more we recycle, the faster we will go to Heaven. Or, as Councillor De Baeremaeker said after this week's marathon 11-hour debate, "I hope we all go home tonight and remember that we all have a responsibility to this planet and to our children."

It never occurred to me that choosing a coffee cup for my double-double is an ethical decision. But now that I'm enlightened, how hard can it be?

The answer, I am sad to say, is that it's quite a bit harder than you think.

I have now spent many hours researching this matter on your behalf, and I have found entire websites, engineering reports, and university student subcommittees devoted to the environmental impact of coffee cups. The classic of the genre seems to be a study called Reusable and Disposable Cups: An Energy-Based Evaluation, by former chemistry professor Martin B. Hocking, who, I am proud to say, comes from our own University of Victoria.

To perform a proper lifecycle analysis of coffee cups, Prof. Hocking began by calculating the embodied energy (MJ) in each type of cup. Not surprisingly, he found that it takes a great deal more energy to manufacture a reusable ceramic cup than it does to manufacture any kind of disposable cup. For every paper coffee cup you use, you'd have to reuse your ceramic mug at least 39 times to break even, energy-wise (assuming that you wash it once in a while). For every polystyrene cup, you'd have to use your mug a whopping 1,006 times to break even.

I trust that clears things up.

The moral of the story, if you are still with me, is that it's a whole lot easier to harass coffee chains, retailers and citizens than it is to do something that actually makes environmental sense. Take the case of plastic shopping bags. These days, cities can scarcely tax or ban them fast enough. Everybody likes to point to Ireland, which slapped a hefty tax on plastic shopping bags a few years ago. Voila! People practically stopped using them. But then they started buying plastic doggie poop bags and plastic kitchen bags and plastic wastebasket bags to replace all the plastic shopping bags they had formerly recycled.

And just in case you're thinking paper bags are better, think again. Paper bags are even worse than plastic, according to none other than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Plastic bags require much less energy to manufacture, ship and recycle. They generate less air and water pollution, and they take up far less space in landfills. Even so, Ontario's gigantic liquor board has switched to paper bags, a move that does nothing at all for the planet, but no doubt makes its customers feel all warm and fuzzy as they're picking up their evening snort.

In Vancouver, where a plastic-bag ban is also in the air, one brave city councillor admits that the move is largely symbolic. Even David Santillo, a marine biologist at Greenpeace, is a skeptic, partly because, contrary to popular belief, plastic bags don't kill marine animals. "We're not going to solve the problem of waste by focusing on plastic bags," he told the Times of London. "On a global basis plastic bags aren't an issue."

I am rather sure this information will not deter the swarm of 6th-graders who descended on City Hall the other day, warning that plastic bags will destroy the planet. "Children need to lead on this because it's our future," one boy said earnestly. As for the grown-ups, I'm afraid our future is to be harangued by clueless city councillors and sanctimonious 11-year-olds. They have found their WMDs, and their mission is to wipe them from the Earth.


Toronto Community News


toronto_community1.png

community_news_2.png